Foreign companies do not always need to complete a full large-model filing to launch a generative AI product in China. If an app, website, SaaS platform, connected device, or other digital service directly uses a model that has already completed China’s Generative AI Service Filing, the product likely only has to complete the AIGC Registration, known in Chinese as the 生成式人工智能应用或功能登记
This guide explains when AIGC Registration is necessary, when full AIGC Filing is still required, and how foreign companies can structure a China-facing AI application around an already-filed model.
AIGC Registration is the compliant route used for a generative AI application or function that directly calls the capabilities of a model that has already completed filing with the Cyberspace Administration of China, or CAC.
The CAC describes this category as applications or functions that directly use the capabilities of a filed model through an API interface or another method. Unlike a full model filing, the registration is handled primarily by the applicant’s local or provincial cyberspace authority.

Following completion, the application receives an online launch number (上线编号). The application must disclose the relevant filed or registered service information in a prominent location or on its product-details page.As of 30 June 2026, 598 generative AI applications or functions have completed registration in China, compared with 988 generative AI services that had completed full filing.
The CAC’s official list for May and June 2026 illustrates how broadly the registration route is now being used. The entries include consumer platforms, financial institutions, manufacturers, public-service bodies, publishers, and hospitals.
Selected notable registrations include:
| Registered application or function | Registration entity | Why it is notable |
| 腾讯音乐歌声唱作大模型 (Tencent Music singing and songwriting model) | Tencent Music Entertainment Technology (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd. | Music creation and consumer entertainment |
| 格力智能大模型 (Gree intelligent model) | Gree Electric Appliances, Inc. of Zhuhai | AI from a major household-appliance manufacturer |
| 南方基金理财助手大模型 (Southern Asset Management financial assistant) | Southern Asset Management Co., Ltd. | Regulated financial-services use |
| 12345智能体 (12345 intelligent agent) | Beijing Citizen Hotline Service Center | Municipal public-service and citizen-support use |
| 吃鲸AI | Beijing iQIYI Science & Technology Co., Ltd. | Consumer media and entertainment |
| 小泰同学智能助手 (Xiao Tai intelligent assistant) | Taikang Insurance Group Inc. | Insurance-sector application |
| 滴滴平台智能客服 (Didi platform intelligent customer service) | Didi Chuxing (Beijing) Network Platform Technology Co., Ltd. | AI customer service on a major mobility platform |
| 陇上小郎中 | Gansu Provincial Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine | Hospital and healthcare use |
| 新华语典 | Xinhua News Agency | News, publishing, and language-reference use |
| 网易有道词典 (NetEase Youdao Dictionary) | Beijing NetEase Youdao Computer System Co., Ltd. | A widely used dictionary and language-learning product |
| 舒压伴·PressGuard | Jiangsu Province Hospital | Hospital and wellbeing application |
Registration is potentially relevant when a company provides a generative AI application or function to the public in mainland China but does not independently operate a new or modified foundation model.
Typical examples include:
The relevant question is not whether the AI feature is the product’s main function. A generative AI function embedded in a larger app can still require registration if it is made available to the public and falls within China’s generative AI regulatory framework.
Services used only for genuine internal research or by a company’s own employees will generally fall outside the public-facing AIGC registration system. Closed B2B services and limited customer deployments require a case-by-case assessment because the meaning of “provided to the public” can depend on the product structure and local regulatory interpretation.
An application is most likely to qualify for registration when all of the following conditions are satisfied:
Prompt templates, workflow design, application-level orchestration, and an independent user interface do not necessarily require full model filing. They may remain compatible with registration if the underlying filed model is unchanged.
Retrieval-augmented generation, or RAG, requires closer analysis. Using a knowledge base to supply context to an unchanged filed model may still fit the registration route. However, the result depends on how the knowledge base, retrieval system, safety controls, and generation process change the application’s outputs. The applicant should confirm this structure with its local CAC before relying on registration.
Registration will generally not be the appropriate route when the provider is independently operating a new or modified model.
Full AIGC Filing is more likely to be required where the company:
Changing only the product interface does not normally create a new model. Changing the model itself can.
An application that directly calls an unfiled overseas model cannot ordinarily use the simplified registration route merely because the application is operated by a Chinese entity. The underlying filed-model requirement remains the central eligibility condition.
| Requirement | AIGC Registration | Full AIGC Filing |
| Typical applicant | Application provider using a filed model | Provider operating its own, modified, or independently deployed model |
| Underlying model | Must already have a valid China filing | Reviewed as part of the filing |
| Model training review | Generally limited because the foundation model is already filed | Detailed review of training data, model development, and safety alignment |
| Training-data evidence | Normally focused on application data and knowledge sources | Extensive evidence covering training-data sources, legality, quality, and labelling |
| Main review focus | Application functions, use cases, data flows, output controls, user protection, and model relationship | Model architecture, training corpus, model safety, generated-content testing, and service controls |
| Review level | Principally the local or provincial CAC | Provincial review followed by national-level review |
| Result | Online launch number, or 上线编号 | Filing number, or 备案号 |
| Relative complexity | Lighter, but still substantive | Significantly more complex and technical |
Registration is therefore better understood as a different compliance route rather than a simple exemption from filing.
For a broader explanation of the full model-filing regime, see AppInChina’s guide to China’s AIGC Filing.
The CAC periodically publishes an official consolidated list of filed generative AI services and registered applications.
Before selecting a model for a China application, the product provider should verify:
A familiar commercial name is not enough. The official filing may use a technical model name that differs from the consumer-facing brand. One provider may also operate several models, endpoints, versions, or modalities under separate filings.
The application provider should obtain written confirmation from the model provider and include appropriate cooperation obligations in the commercial agreement. The contract should address filing information, regulator queries, changes to the model, safety incidents, service continuity, data handling, and notification if the underlying filing or model architecture changes.
China has not published one uniform national registration checklist for every province. The exact documents, submission format, testing process, and terminology are controlled in practice by the applicant’s local CAC.
A typical registration package may include:
Because local requirements change, applicants should obtain the current form and evidence list directly from the relevant CAC office before preparing the final submission.
Using a filed foundation model does not transfer all compliance responsibility to the model provider. The downstream application controls how the model is presented, what data is supplied to it, which users can access it, and how the generated content is used.
The application should therefore be able to:
The controls described in the registration documents must exist in the live test environment. Generic policies that do not match the actual product can lead to questions, remediation, or rejection.
Registered applications must comply with China’s Measures for Labelling AI-Generated and Synthetic Content and the mandatory national standard GB 45438-2025.
Depending on the service, the application may need:
Labels must continue to work when content is downloaded, copied, or exported. The application’s user agreement should explain the labelling method and the user’s responsibilities when publishing generated content.
The application cannot assume that the foundation-model provider’s labelling controls will automatically satisfy the product’s obligations. The downstream interface, export function, file processing, and content-distribution workflow must also be assessed.
A typical registration project follows these stages:
Confirm that the service is public-facing, uses generative AI, and directly calls a model that has already completed filing. Identify any fine-tuning, RAG, agent, plug-in, or application-layer functions that could affect the route.
Determine which entity will operate the China product, contract with the model provider, control user data, maintain the service, and communicate with the local CAC.
Contact the cyberspace authority responsible for the applicant’s jurisdiction. Confirm that registration is available for the proposed architecture and obtain the current form, document list, and testing instructions.
Obtain the model’s exact filing information, service agreement, technical documentation, data-handling details, and a commitment to assist with regulatory questions and future changes.
Complete the registration form, technical description, user-facing policies, content controls, safety testing, AI labels, complaint process, and test environment.
Provide the registration materials and test access to the local authority. The authority may review the documents, test the service, and request explanations or remediation.
Once registration is completed, the application receives an 上线编号. The product should prominently disclose the registered service information, relevant model name, and filing or launch number as required.
The exact sequence varies by province. Some authorities may request preliminary product information or testing before accepting the complete package.
No. AIGC Registration addresses the application’s use of a filed generative AI model. It does not replace other China internet approvals.
A registered application may also require:
| Requirement | Why it may apply |
| Internet Information Service Algorithm Filing | The product provides generation or synthesis functions with public-opinion attributes or social-mobilization capability |
| ICP Filing or Commercial ICP License | The website, SaaS platform, or online service is hosted or commercially operated in China |
| Mobile App Filing | The generative AI function is provided through a mobile app distributed in China |
| Public Security Bureau Filing | The China-hosted website or service falls within the relevant public-security registration requirements |
| Cybersecurity classified protection | The China information system requires classified cybersecurity protection measures |
| Personal information and data-transfer compliance | The app processes Chinese users’ prompts, files, account information, identifiers, or logs |
| Sector approval | The service operates in news, publishing, healthcare, finance, education, audiovisual content, mapping, or another regulated sector |
The CAC’s algorithm filing system is separate from the local AIGC registration process. In practice, app stores and platform partners may ask for the relevant filing or registration information before allowing a generative AI product to launch.
There is no uniform national statutory processing period for AIGC Registration. Timing depends on:
Registration is normally less complex than full AIGC Filing because the underlying model has already been reviewed. Companies should nevertheless allow several weeks to several months for route confirmation, document preparation, product testing, authority review, and remediation. Registration should be planned as a pre-launch workstream rather than left until app-store submission.
The government procedure itself is not the only cost. A project may require Chinese cloud services, model API fees, product localization, legal and technical documentation, safety testing, content moderation, algorithm filing, privacy work, and local compliance support.
Registration creates ongoing responsibilities. The application provider should continue to:
Registration does not mean that every future version of the application is automatically covered. Adding a new model, modality, use case, knowledge source, agent capability, or high-risk function may change the original assessment.
The CAC’s 2026 nationwide campaign addressing AI application irregularities specifically identifies failure to complete required model filing or registration as an enforcement target. Providers should therefore keep the registered product, live technical controls, and public disclosures aligned.
Common problems include:
The most effective way to avoid these issues is to decide the registration architecture before finalizing the model contract and China technical deployment.
AppInChina helps foreign companies build and implement a compliant route for AI-powered apps, SaaS platforms, websites, APIs, connected devices, and other digital services in China.
Our support can include:
If your company plans to launch a generative AI function in China using a third-party model, contact us for a free compliance assessment to see what you need to smoothly enter China’s digital market.
